Skip to Content
Biotechnology and health

Genetic Programmers Are the Next Startup Millionaires

The big-ticket acquisition of genetic design company Cell Design Labs signals a coming wave of precision cures.
December 7, 2017
Courtesy of UCSF

A two-year-old company developing molecular “logic” for cancer treatment has been snapped up for $175 million by Gilead Sciences amid a surge of interest in ways to battle disease using engineered immune cells.

The pricey acquisition of Cell Design Labs, a startup that’s produced no drugs, signals an ongoing acquisition frenzy around one of cancer medicine’s most promising approaches.

Cell Design Labs, founded by University of California, San Francisco, synthetic biologist Wendell Lim, creates “programs” to install inside T cells, the killer cells of the immune system, giving them new abilities.

Beginning in August, the U.S. approved two novel treatments in which a person’s T cells are genetically reprogrammed to seek and destroy cancer cells.

Known as “CAR-T,” the treatments are both revolutionary and hugely expensive. A single dose is priced at around $500,000 but often results in a cure. Gilead quickly paid $12 billion to acquire Kite Pharma, maker of one of those treatments.

The initial T cell treatments, however, work only with blood cancers. Now, by picking up Lim’s company, Gilead is investing in the next generation of cell designs that could help treat more types of cancer.

Going after tumors of the brain, lung, or liver is going to require more precision to kill cancer cells without destroying those vital organs.

“The first wave of these cell therapies, the miracle was that something worked at all,” says Lim. “In the future it will be much more of an engineering discipline. These cells are programmable, so having the right operating system and right language are critical to reaching the next level of sophistication and predictability.”

Cell Design Labs, which claims to control key patents covering designer T cells, had been developing new designs, including one featuring a molecular dial that let them turn the killing activity of T cells up or down. Another featured a T cell reengineered to turn on only if it is attached to not one but two separate molecules on a target cell. That feature could be helpful in safely hitting harder-to-reach tumors.

In many ways, Lim says, he got “lucky” in becoming one of the first to pair synthetic biology with immune cells.

Six years ago, he says, he was still fooling around with yeast and neurons, using his training to make them do interesting tricks by adding new functions.

But his thinking changed after a meeting with Carl June of the University of Pennsylvania medical school, the doctor famous for early efforts to show that T cell treatments could save leukemia patients.

“Then it dawned on me that the ability to reengineer immune cells was going to matter,” Lim recalls. “It was like a scene from The Graduate.” Except instead of plastics, June wanted him to remember that the immune system could be the perfect setting for his ideas.

Gilead will pay up to $567 million in total if things go well with the technology, showing just how vital genetic programming techniques will be in taking the therapies to the next level of sophistication.

The ability to design T cells with precision also means companies will probably be able to go beyond cancer, turning them into drug delivery drones, letting them hunt HIV, or maybe using them to solve autoimmune diseases (see “10 Breakthrough Technologies 2016: Immune Engineering”).

Deep Dive

Biotechnology and health

FDA advisors just said no to the use of MDMA as a therapy

The studies demonstrating MDMA’s efficacy against PTSD left experts with too many questions to greenlight the treatment.

Biotech companies are trying to make milk without cows

The bird flu crisis on dairy farms could boost interest in milk protein manufactured in microorganisms and plants. 

Is this the end of animal testing?

Researchers are increasingly turning to organ-on-a-chip technology for drug testing and other applications.

What’s next for MDMA

The FDA is poised to approve the notorious party drug as a therapy. Here’s what it means, and where similar drugs stand in the US. 

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.